Reproducibility in Thirty-five Years of Consumer Intentions Research: A Longitudinal Review and Directions for Future Research
Keywords:replication, consumer intentions, purchase intentions, behavioral intentions, consumer behavior
This study examined replications in consumer intentions research over the last thirty-five years (1986 to 2021). The results revealed that there were very few replication studies have been published in the consumer intentions research. Satisfaction researchers have paid little attention to the discussion on the state of replications. There were more close replications than exact replications in these publications. There was a clear emphasis on null hypothesis significance testing in the replications studied. Recommendations are offered to ensure that replications become a recognized and frequent component of research pertaining to consumer intentions in marketing, advertising, and other business and management areas. With the rapid penetration of the Internet and Web 2.0 technologies in consumers' daily lives, previous reproducibility claims need to be verified and validated over time. This research, therefore, addresses, the question about relationship between the age of the concept of consumer intentions, advancements in advertising and marketing fields, and the practice of replication in the research process. Directions for future replication research and practice in this area are provided.
Adams, A., K. Ajrouch, H. Henderson, and I. Heard (2005). Service-learning outcomes research: the role and scarcity of replication studies. Journal of Applied Sociology, 22(2), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/19367244052200204
Allen, M., and R. Preiss (1993). Replication and meta-analysis: A necessary connection. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 8, 9 –20
Anderson, N. (1973). Information integration theory applied to attitudes about US presidents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033874
Aw, E., L. Flynn, and H. Chong (2019). Antecedents and consequences of self-congruity: replication and extension. Journal of Consumer Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-10-2017-2424
Bagozzi, R. (1992). The self-regulation of attitudes, intentions and behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 178–204. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786945
Bamberger, P. (2019). On the replicability of abductive research in management and organizations: Internal replication and its alternatives. Academy of Management Discoveries, 5(2), 103-108. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2019.0121
Beck, C. (1994). Replication strategies for nursing research. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 26(3), 191-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1994.tb00312.x
Begley, C., and L. Ellis (2012). Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature, 483 (7391), 531-533. https://doi.org/10.1038/483531a
Beltramin, R. (2000). Exploring the effectiveness of business gifts: Replication and extension. Journal of Advertising, 29(2), 75-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2000.10673610
Bergh, D., B. Sharp, H. Aguinis, and M. Li (2017), Is there a credibility crisis in strategic management research? Evidence on the reproducibility of study findings. Strategic Organization, 15 (3), 423-436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127017701076
Brandt, M., H. Ijzerman, A. Diksterhuis, F. Farach, J. Geller, R. Giner-Sorolla, J. Grange, M. Perugini, J. Spies, and A. Van’t Veer (2014). The Replication Recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005
Campbell, D., and J. Stanley (1963). Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Cafri, G., J. Kromrey, and M. Brannick (2010). A meta-meta-analysis: Empirical review of statistical power, Type I error rates, effect sizes, and model selection of meta-analyses published in psychology. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 239 –270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171003680187
Carter, E., F. Sch€onbrodt, W. Gervais, and J. Hilgard (2019). Correcting for bias in psychology: A comparison of meta-analytic methods. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847196
Chaffee, S., and C. Berger (1987). What communication scientists do. In C. R. Berger & S. H. Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of communication science (pp. 91–122). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Chan, M., and R. Arvey (2012). Meta-analysis and the development of knowledge. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 79 –92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611429355
Cheong, Y., F. de Gregorio, F., and K. Kim (2017). Viewer perceptions of television commercials: a conceptual replication. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 34(7), 612–623. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-03-2016-1743
Chitturi, R. (2009). Emotions by design: A consumer perspective. International Journal of Design, 3(2).
Christensen, G., and E. Miguel (2018). Transparency, reproducibility, and the credibility of economics research. Journal of Economic Literature, 56(3), 920–980. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20171350
Coffman, L., M. Niederle, and A. Wilson (2017). A proposal to organize and promote replications. American Economic Review, 107(5), 41-45. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20171122
Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186
Collins, H. (1985). Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. University of Chicago Press.
Cox, R. (1948). The Economics of Instalment Buying. New York:NY, Ronald Press Company.
Crandall, C., and J. Sherman (2016). On the scientific superiority of conceptual replications for scientific progress. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.002
Cronin, J., M. Brady, and G. Hult (2000). Assessing the Effects of Quality, Value, and Customer Satisfaction on Consumer Behavioral Intentions in Service Environments. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 193–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00028-2
Darley, W. (2000). Status of Replication Studies in Marketing: A Validation and Extension. Marketing Management Journal, 10(2), 121–132.
Diddi, S., and S. Manchiraju (2018). Value-Based Segmentation of US Luxury Consumers: Conceptual Replication and Model Validation. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v10n4p26
Diwanji, V., and J. Cortese (2020). Contrasting User Generated Videos versus Brand Generated Videos in Ecommerce, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 54(May), 102024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.102024.
Diwanji, V., and J. Cortese (2021). Comparing the Impact of Presentation Format of Consumer Generated Reviews on Shoppers’ Decisions in an Online Social Commerce, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 22(1), 22-45, http://www.jecr.org/node/621.
Dragojevic, M., J. Gasiorek, and H. Giles (2015). Communication accommodation theory. The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication, 1-21.
Duvendack, M., R. Palmer-Jones, and W. Reed (2017), What is meant by ‘replication’ and why does it encounter resistance in economics? American Economic Review, 107(5), 46-51. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20171031
Eagly, A., and S. Chaiken (1993). The Psychology ofAttitudes. New York. NY: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
Easley, R., and C. Madden (2000). Replications and Extensions in Marketing and Management Research. Journal of Business Research, 48(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00080-0
Easley, R., C, Madden, and M. Dunn (2000). Conducting Marketing Science: The Role of Replication in the Research Process. Journal of Business Research, 48, 83–92.
Eden, D. (2002). From the editors: replication, meta-analysis, scientific progress, and AMJ’s publication policy. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 841-846. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2002.7718946
Eden, D., and T. Aviv (2002). Replication, meta-analysis, scientific progress, and AMJ’s publication policy. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 841– 846.
Eisend, M., G. Franke, and J. Leigh (2016). Re-inquiries in Advertising Research. Journal of Advertising, 45(1), 1–3.
Epskamp, S., and M. Nuijten (2019). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. R package version 1.3.0. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/statcheck/index.html
Evanschitzky, H., C. Baumgarth, R. Hubbard, and J. Armstrong (2007). Replication Research’s Disturbing Trend. Journal of Business Research, 60, 411–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.003
Evanschitzky, H., and J. Armstrong (2013). Research with In-built replications: Comment and further suggestions for replication research. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1406-1408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.05.006
Foxall, G. (1993). Consumer Behaviour as an Evolutionary Process. European Journal of Marketing, 27(8), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569310042936
Gallo, I., S. Sood, T. Mann, and T. Gilovich (2017). The heart and the head: On choosing experiences intuitively and possessions deliberatively. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(3), 754-768. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1997
Glasser, W. (1999). Choice theory: A new psychology of personal freedom. Harper Perennial.
Gordon, M., D. Viganola, M. Bishop, Y. Chen, A. Dreber, B. Goldfedder, F. Holzmeister, M. Johannesson, Y. Liu, C. Twardy, J. and Wang (2020). Are replication rates the same across academic fields? Community forecasts from the DARPA SCORE programme. Royal Society open science, 7(7), 200566–200566. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200566
Gould, J., and W. Kolb (Eds.). 1964. A dictionary of the social sciences. London: Tavistock Publications.
Guest, O., and A. Martin (2021). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. Advance online publication, 16(4), 789–802. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585
Haberstroh, K., U. Orth, S. Hoffmann, and B. Brunk (2017). Consumer response to unethical corporate behavior: A re-examination and extension of the moral decoupling model. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(1), 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2661-x
Hall, J., and B. Martin (2019). Towards a taxonomy of research misconduct: The case of business school research. Research Policy, 48(2), 414-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.006
Harms, C., H. Genau, C. Meschede, and A. Beauducel (2018). Does it actually feel right? A replication attempt of the rounded price effect. Royal Society open science, 5(4), 171127. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171127
Harz, N., S. Hohenberg, and C. Homburg (2021). Virtual reality in new product development: Insights from pre-launch sales forecasting for durables. Journal of Marketing, 00222429211014902. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429211014902
Higgins, E. T. (2008). Regulatory fit. Handbook of motivation science, 356-72.
Homer, P. (1990). The mediating role of attitude toward the ad: Some additional evidence. Journal of Marketing research, 27(1), 78-86. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172553
Hong, H., H. Kim, and S. Lennon (2018). The effects of perceived quality and usefulness of consumer reviews on review reading and purchase intention. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 31, 1-19. https://jcsdcb.com/index.php/JCSDCB/article/view/288
Hubbard, R., and J. Armstrong (1994). Replications and Extensions in Marketing: Rarely Published but Quite Contrary. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11(3), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3<243::AID-SMJ951>3.0.CO;2-0
Hubbard, R., and R. Lindsay (2013). From Significant Difference to Significant Sameness: Proposing a Paradigm Shift in Business Research. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1377–1388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.05.002
Huber, J., and J. McCann, (1982). The impact of inferential beliefs on product evaluations. Journal of marketing research, 19(3), 324-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378201900305
Hunter, J. (2001). The Desperate Need for Replications. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1086/321953
Irvine, E. (2021). The role of replication studies in theory building. Perspectives on Psychological Science. Advance online publication, 16(4), 844–853. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970558
Jacoby, J. (1978). Consumer Research: A State of the Art Review. Journal of Marketing, 42, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/1249890
Jasny, B., G. Chin, T. Chong, L., and S. Vignieri (2011). Introduction: again, and again, and again .... Science, 334(6060), 1225-1225. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.334.6060.1225
Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. American psychologist, 58(9), 697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
Kalyanam, K., J. McAteer, J. Marek, J., J. Hodges, and L. Lin (2018). Cross channel effects of search engine advertising on brick & mortar retail sales: Meta-analysis of large-scale field experiments on Google. com. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 16(1), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-017-9188-7
Kerr, G., D. Schultz, and I. Lings (2016). ‘Someone should do something’: Replication and an agenda for collective action. Journal of Advertising, 45(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2015.1077492
Key, E. (2016). How are we doing? Data access and replication in political science. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49(2), 268–272. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096516000184
Kitchen, P., G. Kerr, D. Schultz, R. McColl, and H. Pals (2014). The elaboration likelihood model: review, critique and research agenda. European Journal of Marketing, 48, 11-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2011-0776
Kline, R. (2013). Beyond significance testing: Statistics reform in the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Kvarven, A., E. Strømland, and M. Johannesson (2020). Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(4), 423-434.
Lakatos, I. (1976). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In Can theories be refuted? 205–259. Dordrecht: Springer.
Leone, R. (1995). Generalizing What Is Known about Temporal Aggregation and Advertising Carryover. Marketing Science, 14(3), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.14.3.G141
Leppink, J. (2017). Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative-mixed methods labels: Research questions, developments, and the need for replication. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 12(2), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2016.11.008
Lim, J., R. Olshavsky, and J. Kim, J. (1988). The impact of inferences on product evaluations: Replication and extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(3), 308-316. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172534
Lindsay, R., and A. Ehrenberg (1993). The design of replicated studies. American Statistician, 47(3), 217-228. https://doi.org/10.2307/2684982
Liu, R., H. Watkins, and Y. Yi (1997). Taxonomy of consumer complaint behavior: Replication and extension. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 10. https://jcsdcb.com/index.php/JCSDCB/article/view/152
Macdonald, E., and B. Sharp (2000). Brand awareness effects on consumer decision making for a common, repeat purchase product: A replication. Journal of business research, 48(1), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00070-8
MacKenzie, S., R. Lutz, and G. Belch (1986). The Role of Attitude toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(2), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151660
Madden, C., R. Easley, and M. Dunn (1995). How Journal Editors View Replication Research. Journal of Advertising, 24(4), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1995.10673490
Makel, M., and J. Plucker (2014). Facts are more important than novelty: Replication in the education sciences. Educational Researcher, 43, 304 –316. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14545513
Makel, M., J. Plucker, J. Freeman, A. Lombardi, B. Simonsen, and M. Coyne (2016). Replication of special education research: Necessary but far too rare. Remedial and Special Education, 37(4), 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516646083
Makel, M., K. Smith, M. McBee, S. Peters, and E. Miller (2019). A path to greater credibility: Large-scale collaborative education research. AERA Open, 5(4), 233285841989196. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419891963
Martin, B. (2013). Whither research integrity? Plagiarism, self-plagiarism and coercive citation in an age of research assessment. Research policy, 42(5), 1005-1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.011
Martin, G., and R. Clarke (2017). Are psychology journals anti-replication? A snapshot of editorial practices. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 523. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00523
Meyer, K., A. van Witteloostuijn, and S. Beugelsdijk (2017). What’s in a p? Reassessing best practices for conducting and reporting hypothesis-testing research. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(5), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0078-8
Monroe, K. (1992). Editorial – on Replications in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, Preface.
Nath, P., J. Devlin, and V. Reid (2018). The effects of online reviews on service expectations: Do cultural value orientations matter?. Journal of Business Research, 90, 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.001
Nelson, L., J. Simmons, and U. Simonsohn (2018). Psychology’s Renaissance. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 511–534. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011836
Neuliep, J., and R. Crandall (1993). Reviewer bias against replication research. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 21-29.
Nosek, B., and D. Lakens (2014). Registered reports: A method to increase the credibility of published results. Social Psychology, 45(3), 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192
Oliver, R. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of marketing research, 17(4), 460-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700405
Open Science Collaboration (2012). An open, large-scale, collaborative effort to estimate the reproducibility of psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 657–660. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462588
Park, J., O. Venger, D. Park, and L. Reid (2015). Replication in Advertising Research, 1980–2012: A Longitudinal Analysis of Leading Advertising Journals. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 36(2), 115–135.
Pashler, H., and C. Harris (2012). Is the replicability crisis overblown? Three arguments examined. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 531–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463401
Plucker, J., and M. Makel (2021). Replication is important for educational psychology: Recent developments and key issues. Educational Psychologist, 56(2), 90–100.
Popper, K. (1935/1959). The logic of scientific discovery, translation by the author of Logik der Forschung (1935), London: Hutchinson. Republished 2002/London & New York: Routledge Classics.
Pridemore, W., M. Makel, and J. Plucker (2018). Replication in criminology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Criminology, 1(1), 19–38.
Pryor, K. and R. Brodie (1998). How advertising slogans can prime evaluations of brand extensions: further empirical results. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 7(6), 497-508. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610429810244666
Radder, H. (1992). Experimental reproducibility and the experimenters' regress. In PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (Vol. 1992, No. 1, pp. 63-73). Philosophy of Science Association. https://doi.org/10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1992.1.192744
Reid, L., H. Rotfeld, and R. Wimmer (1982). Replication Requests and the Response of Advertising Researchers. 85–88. Baton Rogue: LA: American Academy of Advertising.
Reid, L., L. Soley, and R. Wimmer (1981). Replication in Advertising Research 1977,1978,1979. Journal of Advertising, 10(1).
Rodgers, S., Y. Wang, R. Rettie, and F. Alpert (2007). The web motivation inventory: replication, extension and application to internet advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 26(4), 447-476. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2007.1107302
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Replication in Behavioral Research. In Replication Research in the Social Sciences, edited by J. Neuliep, 1–30. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ryan, J., and S. Tipu (2022). Business and management research: Low instances of replication studies and a lack of author independence in replications. Research Policy, 51(1), 104408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104408
Saylors, R., and D. Trafimow (2021). Why the increasing use of complex causal models is a problem: On the danger sophisticated theoretical narratives pose to truth. Organizational Research Methods, 24(3), 616-629. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428119893452
Schmidt, S. (2009). Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 13, 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015108
Schmidt, F., and I. Oh (2016). The crisis of confidence in research findings in psychology: is lack of replication the real problem? Or is it something else? Archives of Scientific Psychology, 4(1), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.1037/arc0000029
Schmidt, S. (2017). Replication. In M. C. Makel and J. A. Plucker (Eds.), Toward a more perfect psychology: Improving trust, accuracy, and transparency in research (pp. 215–232). American Psychological Association.
Shadish, W., T. Cook, and D. Campbell (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Shaft, T., D. Wang, and L. Zhu (2018). Maybe Waiting is Bad: A Replication Investigating Website Delay, Familiarity, and Breadth. AIS Transactions on Replication Research, 4(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.17705/1atrr.00026
Sheth, J., and R. Sisodia (1999). Revisiting Marketing’s Lawlike Generalisations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070399271006
Smarandescu, L., and T. Shimp (2015). Drink coca-cola, eat popcorn, and choose powerade: testing the limits of subliminal persuasion. Marketing Letters, 26(4), 715-726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9294-1
Smart, R. (1964). The importance of negative results in psychological research. The Canadian Psychologist, 5(4), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0083036
Smith, J. K., L. Smith, and B. Smith (2017). The reproducibility crisis in psychology: Attack of the clones or phantom menace? In M. C. Makel & J. A. Plucker (Eds.), Toward a more perfect psychology: Improving trust, accuracy, and transparency in research (pp. 273–287). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Soderlund, M., and N. Ohman (2003). Behavioral intentions in satisfaction research revisited. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 16, 53. https://jcsdcb.com/index.php/JCSDCB/article/view/75
Spears, N., and S. Singh (2004). Measuring Attitude toward the Brand and Purchase Intentions. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2004.10505164
Stroebe, W., and F. Strack (2014). The alleged crisis and the illusion of exact replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613514450
Taute, H., J. Sierra, L. Carter, and A. Maher (2017). A sequential process of brand tribalism, brand pride and brand attitude to explain purchase intention: a cross-continent replication study. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 6(3), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-08-2016-1289
Tipu, S., and J. Ryan (2021). Are business and management journals anti-replication? An analysis of editorial policies. Management Research Review, 45(1), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-01-2021-0050
Tourish, D. (2020). The triumph of nonsense in management studies. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 19(1), 99-109. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2019.0255
Tsang, E. W., and K. Kwan (1999). Replication and theory development in organizational science: A critical realist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 759-780. https://doi.org/10.2307/259353
Utts, J. (1991). Replication and meta-analysis in parapsychology. Statistical Science, 6, 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177011577
Valentine, J. (2019). Expecting and learning from null results. Educational Researcher, 48(9), 611–613. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19891440
van Rooij, I., and Baggio, G. (2021). Theory before the test: How to build high-verisimilitude explanatory theories in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 682–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970604
van Witteloostuijn, A. (2016). What happened to Popperian falsification? Publishing neutral and negative findings: moving away from biased publication practices. Cross Cultural and Strategic Management, 23(3), 481-508. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-03-2016-0084
Walker, R., G. Brewer, M. Lee, N. Petrovsky, and A. van Witteloostuijn (2019). Best practice recommendations for replicating experiments in public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(4): 609–626. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy062
Wang, S., W. Ngamsiriudom, and C. Hsieh (2015). Trust disposition, trust antecedents, trust, and behavioral intention. The Service Industries Journal, 35(10), 555-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2015.1047827
Wells, W. (1993). Discovery-oriented Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 489-504. https://doi.org/10.1086/209318
Whitlark, D., M. Geurts, and M. Swenson (1993). New product forecasting with a purchase intention survey. The Journal of Business Forecasting, 12(3), 18.
Wiedmann, K., N. Hennigs, and A. Siebels (2009). Value-based segmentation of luxury consumption behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 26(7), 625-651. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20292
Williams, R., J. Polanin, and T. Pigott (2017). Meta-analysis and reproducibility. In. M. C. Makel & J. A. Plucker (Eds.), Toward a more perfect psychology (pp. 255–270). American Psychological Association.
Zwaan, R., A. Etz, R. Lucas, and M. Donnellan (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, 1-61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972
Each volume is copyrighted by Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior. We encourage authors to submit published articles to research aggregators such as researchgate.net or academia.edu. You may use the PDF files from the published journal for submission to these aggregators.