Validation and Adaptation into Spanish of the Revised Sense of Coherence Scale (SOC-R): A Scale Associated with Life Satisfaction

Authors

  • Cecilia Yaccarini Universidad Maimónides-CONICET
  • Hugo Simkin Universidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET
  • Rahel Bachem University of Zurich
  • Susana Azzollini Universidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET

Keywords:

Sense of coherence, Adaptation, Validation, Life satisfaction, Psychometric properties, Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Revised Sense of Coherence (SOC-R) in Argentina, which assesses the general ability to perceive life phenomena as connected and to balance positive and negative appraisals of life experiences. A total of 575 people participated in the study with ages between 18 and 84 years (M = 43.94, SD = 15.90) and both genders (male= 35.7 %, female= 64.3 %). A 3-factor model resulted in acceptable fit indices (NNFI = .95; CFI = .97; IFI = .97; RMSEA = .054). Results indicated an acceptable internal consistency for the subscales Manageability (ω= .73; α= .69), Reflection (ω= .89; α= .85) and Balance (ω= .70; α= .55). The adaptation into Spanish presents 13 items, as proposed by the original authors. The findings showed that the scale is valid to be used in the Argentine population.

References

Alvi, S. M., Akhtar, A., & Aftab, N. (2021). Sense of coherence as a predictor of positive psychological outcomes among adults. Journal of Management Practices, Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(2), 28–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33152/jmphss-5.2.4

Antonovsky, A. (1979). Health, stress, and coping. Jossey-Bass.

Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. Jossey-Bass.

Arciero, G., & & Guidano, V. F. (2000). Experience, explanation, and the quest for coherence. In Constructions of disorder: Meaning-making frameworks for psychotherapy (pp. 91–118). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/10368-005

Bachem, R., & Maercker, A. (2016). Development and psychometric evaluation of a revised sense of coherence scale. European Association of Psychological Assessment, 34(3), 206–215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000323

Beauducel, A., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13(2), 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2

Behnke, A., Conrad, D., Kolassa, I. T., & Rojas, R. (2019). Higher sense of coherence is associated with better mental and physical health in emergency medical services: Results from investigations on the revised sense of coherence scale (SOC-R) in rescue workers. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2019.1606628

Brown, T. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press.

Chiesi, F., Marunic, G., & Lau, C. (2020). Validation study of an Italian version of the revised Sense of Coherence Scale (SOC-R). Current Psychology, 41(2016), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00606-6

Eriksson, M., & Lindström, B. (2005). Validity of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 460–466. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.018085

Feldt, T., Metsapelto, R. L., Kinnunen, U., & Pulkkinen, L. (2007). Sense of coherence and five-factor approach to personality - Conceptual relationships. European Psychologist, 12, 165–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.12.3.165

Green, S. B., & Yang, Y. (2015). Evaluation of dimensionality in the assessment of internal consistency reliability: Coefficient alpha and omega Coefficients. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(4), 14–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12100

Gruszczynska, E. (2006). What is measured by the orientation to life questionnaire? Construct validity of the instrument for the Sense of Coherence measurement. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 37(2), 74–83.

McGee, S. L., Höltge, J., Maercker, A., & Thoma, M. V. (2018). Sense of coherence and stress-related resilience: Investigating the mediating and moderating mechanisms in the development of resilience following stress or adversity. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0249-9

Moksnes, U. K., Løhre, A., & Espnes, G. A. (2013). The association between sense of coherence and life satisfaction in adolescents. Quality of Life Research, 22(6), 1331–1338.

Pallant, J. F., & Lae, L. (2002). Sense of coherence, well-being, coping and personality factors: Further evaluation of the sense of coherence scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00134-9

Routledge, C., FioRito, T. A., Bitzan, J. D., & Abeyta, A. A. (2021). Does existential wellbeing promote positive attitudes about entrepreneurs? Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 34, 1–15. https://jcsdcb.com/index.php/JCSDCB/article/view/474

Sirgy, M. J., Lee, D. J., Larsen, V., & Wright, N. (1998). Satisfaction with material possessions and general well-being: The role of materialism. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 11, 103–118. https://jcsdcb.com/index.php/JCSDCB/article/view/198

Stier, S., Breuer, J., Siegers, P., & Thorson, K. (2019). Integrating survey data and digital trace data: Key issues in developing an emerging field. Social Science Computer Review, 38(5), 503–516. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319843669

Strümpfer, D., Gouws, J., & Viviers, M. (1998). Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale related to negative and positive affectivity. European Journal of Personality, 12, 457–480. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199811/12)12:6<457::AID-PER314>3.0.CO;2-%23

Tekin, H., & Kirlioglu, M. (2019). Revize Edilmi ş Duygusal Tutarl ı l ı k Ölçeği (RDTÖ ) Evaluation of the revised sense of coherence scale ( SOC-R ): Turkish validity and reliability study. Social Sciences Researches Journal, 591–604. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gopsbad/issue/51614/629778

Thoma, M. V., Mc Gee, S. L., Fegert, J. M., Glaesmer, H., Brähler, E., & Maercker, A. (2018). Evaluation of the revised sense of coherence scale in a representative German sample. PLoS ONE, 13(12), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209550

Vainio, M. M., & Daukantaitė, D. (2016). Grit and different aspects of well-being: Direct and indirect relationships via sense of coherence and authenticity. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(5), 2119–2147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9688-7

Viladrich, C., Angulo-Brunet, A., & Doval, E. (2017). Un viaje alrededor de alfa y omega para estimar la fiabilidad de consistencia interna. Anales de Psicología, 33(3), 755. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.33.3.268401

Volanen, S., Suominen, S., Lahelma, E., Koskenvuo, M., & Silventoinen, K. (2007). Negative life events and stability of sense of coherence: a five-year follow-up study of Finnish women and men. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48(5), 433–441. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00598.x

Von Humboldt, S., Leal, I., & Pimenta, F. (2014). Living well in later life: The influence of sense of coherence, and socio-demographic, lifestyle and health-related factors on older adults’ satisfaction with life. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 9(3), 631–642. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-013-9262-6

Wright, N. D., & Larsen, V. (1993). Materialism and life satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction, and Complaining Behavior, 6, 158–165. https://jcsdcb.com/index.php/JCSDCB/article/view/618

Downloads

Published

2022-05-12